<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mad Prime: The decline of the microarray</title>
    <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2012/01/25/the-decline-of-the-microarray</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>The decline of the microarray</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Via &lt;a href="https://plus.google.com/103004892459511645513/posts"&gt;David Nusinow on Google+&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://jermdemo.blogspot.com/2012/01/when-can-we-expect-last-damn-microarray.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When can we expect the last damn microarray paper?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (http://jermdemo.blogspot.com/2012/01/when-can-we-expect-last-damn-microarray.html)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2016 for the last microarray paper? Sounds a bit optimistic, but we can dream. Of course there will likely be niche uses for microarrays for a while yet (e.g. cheap linkage analysis in a pedigree, as in my last post...) -- the analysis here is just counting usage of the word in the title (presumably indicating the technology is a major focus of the paper).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:b88d1e25-84e5-4c20-8169-72bb8a3fbcee</guid>
      <author>Madeleine Ball</author>
      <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2012/01/25/the-decline-of-the-microarray</link>
      <category>genetics</category>
      <category>biology</category>
      <category>technology</category>
      <category>microarrays</category>
      <category>publishing</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

