<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mad Prime: It's a Boy!: or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Direct to Consumer Genomics</title>
    <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2012/01/21/its-a-boy-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-direct-to-consumer-genomics</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>It's a Boy!: or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Direct to Consumer Genomics</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is going to be a long, complicated post so I'll get the simple personal news out of the way first: It's a boy!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Normally such news would be interesting, but neither good nor bad. In my case, however, I was really hoping for a girl &#8211; for some concrete reasons of family history. I have two uncles (my mother's brothers) with mental retardation, likely caused by an unknown mutation. If that mutation is &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-linked_recessive_inheritance"&gt;X-linked&lt;/a&gt;, there's a chance I'm a carrier for that X-linked mutation. If I have a boy, there's a chance I could pass it on to him.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Assuming it is X-linked, what are my chances of being a carrier? My mother had a 50% chance of inheriting it and I had a 50% chance of inheriting one from her &#8211; a total of 25% chance (50% of 50%). However I have something in my favor that makes this chance lower: I have two brothers who are clearly unaffected. Applying this new information to a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes'_theorem"&gt;Bayesian calculation&lt;/a&gt;, my mother's chance of being a carrier becomes 20% and my own becomes 10%. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would have a 5% chance of passing it on to a male child (50% of 10%). Of course, whatever they have might not be X-linked (see footnote). I estimate the chances their issue is X-linked is around 50%, which would make the risk 2-3% instead of 5%. This is small but not trivial &#8211; it's like the risk a 44-year-old woman would have for &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome"&gt;Down Syndrome&lt;/a&gt; in her child. It is standard to offer such an expectant mother the option to test her fetus and choose to abort it (a common decision, if controversial). I have no such option, we can't test for a mutation if we don't know what it is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And so, when I told my mother the sex, she decided to try to have her brothers diagnosed ASAP. It's not something she wanted to do, it would be difficult &#8211; it would require discussion with their caretakers, arrangements with medical providers, and it would disrupt their routine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was thinking hard about what I could do myself. My mind challenged with this new stressful information, I thought of something I could have done before now but hadn't occurred to me &#8211; I could use the genetic data from my family members to determine how much &#8220;at risk&#8221; X chromosome DNA I carry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A map of the X inheritance in my family is below (apologies to colorblind people, I believe you can read &#8220;magenta, red, and cyan&#8221; as &#8220;blue, yellow/black, and gray&#8221;):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div align="center"&gt;
  &lt;IMG width=500 SRC=http://www.madprime.org/article_images/20120120_x_inheritance.png&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My grandmother's X's are represented as magenta (safe) and red (mutation bearing) &#8211; my aunt and mother are represented as inheriting a red/magenta mixture from her (we don't know which they got) and a cyan X from my grandfather. My sister and I inherited (1) an X from mom that is a mixture of my grandfather's cyan X and the unknown red/magenta from my grandmother, and (2) an X from our father. My brothers inherited a single X from my mother's parents &#8211; and here I've colored it as only magenta &amp;amp; cyan, because any parts they got from my grandmother are proven to be &#8220;safe&#8221; by the fact that they are not affected.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Such a diagram would lead you to think that inheritance blends the DNA up pretty well each generation, but it really doesn't &#8211; in reality inheritance is extremely blocky. &lt;a href="http://www.23andme.com/"&gt;23andme&lt;/a&gt; provides diagrams of these blocks using the &#8220;Family Inheritance&#8221; and &#8220;Family Inheritance: Advanced&#8221; tools. Because my grandfather and brothers and I have all done 23andme, I can take the blocks I inherited from my grandmother and compare them to what my brothers inherited. If either of them  inherited the same regions, then I knew those parts were confirmed &#8220;safe&#8221;. I only have to worry about regions I inherited from my grandmother and both brothers did not inherit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Based on 23andme, I have the following maps for the X chromosomes of myself and my brothers. What I did was perform a comparison between each of us and our grandfather (all of whom have 23andme data); any regions matching my grandfather were marked as inherited from him, any remaining regions marked as from my grandmother.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div align="center"&gt;
  &lt;IMG width=500 SRC=http://www.madprime.org/article_images/20120121_x_inheritance_2.png&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As you can see, it looks like I'm in the clear! Amazingly, brother 2 (his name is Andrew) managed to &#8220;test&#8221; a whopping 95% of the X our mother inherited from our grandmother! Thank you Andrew, excellent work! While there's 5% from our grandmother that neither brother has, I don't have it either so it's not an issue for me. Our sister does carry that segment -- an eventual diagnosis of our uncles would be useful for her, but there is no pressure to do it quickly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because diagnosis of my uncles was never certain, it's possible this has saved me years of uncertainty as I watched the child for signs of developmental delay. I'm extremely relieved -- and I'm really happy the "direct to consumer" genetic testing industry exists, allowing me to do this analysis. The result could easily have fallen in the other direction: if I found a larger-than-expected untested fraction from our grandmother then my risk estimates would have increased rather than disappeared. I am lucky it turned out the way it did. It's a happy ending for me, and now I can return to the mundane common concerns of pregnancy and children.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;hr/&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Addendum:&lt;/strong&gt; I was asked how much of the second diagram required me processing raw data myself from 23andme. Very little, in fact -- all I needed was the comparison using 23andme's "Family Inheritance: Advanced" tool. (I could theoretically have done this myself if I got the raw data from my grandfather and brothers, but they'd have to download the files and send them to me, and I doubt I'd do a better job). Below is the screenshot of the X chromosome when I compare my grandfather with (top) myself, (middle) brother 1, and (bottom) brother 2. The second diagram was drawn using this as a template.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div align="center"&gt;
  &lt;IMG width=500 SRC=http://www.madprime.org/article_images/20120121_23andme_screenshot.png&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;hr/&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Footnote:&lt;/strong&gt; X-linked disorder was the major concern here. The other major possibility would be an &#8220;autosomal recessive&#8221; disorder, but the chances I would have an affected child even if I carried such a gene would be extremely low &#8211; Chris would also have to be a carrier for a mutation in the same gene (presumably an extremely rare event).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Other possibilities I could worry about carrying include &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragile_X_syndrome"&gt;Fragile X&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosomal_translocation"&gt;balanced translocations&lt;/a&gt;. Fragile X is a string of trinucleotide repeats that can expand to a disease-causing length when passed from mother to child &#8211; I suppose it's theoretically possible one or both of my brothers and I inherited &#8220;premutation&#8221; versions and that mine could expand into &#8220;mutation&#8221; when I pass it to a child. It's also theoretically possible that my grandmother had a &#8220;balanced translocation&#8221; where a disease is caused if you only get one or the other, but not if you get both &#8211; in such a situation it's possible (but very unlikely) that my mother got both, somehow only passed zero or two to each of her children, and passed the same balanced set to me. I think both of these are very unlikely, but I am being tested for them and will get results in two weeks. I don't worry about the outcome of these tests, the scenario that made me so stressed was the inability to know whether I was carrying or passing on a mutation &#8211; to me, being able to test means everything.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:f3623bcb-d073-4ece-b67c-54e5bc1aa8af</guid>
      <author>Madeleine Ball</author>
      <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2012/01/21/its-a-boy-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-direct-to-consumer-genomics</link>
      <category>pregnancy</category>
      <category>personal</category>
      <category>23andme</category>
      <category>dtc</category>
      <category>genetics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"It's a Boy!: or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Direct to Consumer Genomics" by Madeleine</title>
      <description>What's hard to tell from this is that there's a whole X from Grandma that Mom *didn't* get -- if this is an X-linked mutation it could be anywhere on that other X chromosome. So there's only 5% of this X "untested" but 100% of the other X -- it could be anywhere in these. The chances it's hiding in the remaining 5% on this one is just 5 / 105 = 4.8%.
.....
Note that 4.8% is still an improvement -- before we had this knowledge the estimate for both you and me was 10%. Also keep in mind there's a good chance (say 50%) this isn't X-linked in the first place.

If we figured out what the exact mutation is in our uncles, we'd know whether or not you carry it -- because we'd know where it is. Depending on whether you carry it, you'd either have a 0% or 50% chance of passing it on to a son.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:11:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:73219f77-c78f-401e-a561-77d65d64cec0</guid>
      <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2012/01/21/its-a-boy-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-direct-to-consumer-genomics#comment-4819</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"It's a Boy!: or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Direct to Consumer Genomics" by Suzy</title>
      <description>Finally got around to reading this, although I had Dad explain it to me at home last week.  Since then, I've been worried about the portion of the X chromosome that I got and Alex &amp; Andrew haven't automatically tested by their existence (since they didn't have it).  Does this mean I do carry the mutation (if a mutation is at fault) and testing our uncles means will just help me determine the matter of degree (in how likely the chance it will affect my children)?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:16:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2ebf9813-ec03-4d91-aa24-0b1551be0883</guid>
      <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2012/01/21/its-a-boy-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-direct-to-consumer-genomics#comment-4818</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

